Tag Archives: dla


My disabled girlfriend just asked me for a slice of cake. I had to say no. See, I’ve decided to adopt the Conservative approach to cake.

Unfortunately, I explained to her, the purchase of the cake was funded by HARD WORKING PEOPLE, and HARD WORKING PEOPLE didn’t want people who don’t work as hard as her to have access to the luxuries that they can’t have, because despite the fact that they are HARD WORKING PEOPLE, they are still unable to afford cake.

She protested, so I explained that 0.1% of cake benefit claims are fraudulent, so I’ve adopted a policy of guilty-until-proven-innocent, and if she wanted access to the cake, she’d need to go for a fit-for-cake assessment.

I then reminded her that if she wanted the cake badly, she could apply to the access-to-cake fund. But as soon as she looked in the opposite direction I moved the money to my wallet. “Sorry,” I responded disingenuously, “we don’t have enough money to fund your cake.”

She really wasn’t happy about this, so I introduced a new rule in the house. Vulnerable voices were are allowed to campaign against rules in the six months prior to a cake purchase. However, if she incorporates and pays me a big sum of money, I’ll happily allow her to influence future rules.

Next, I told her that she didn’t need the cake, as I’d looked in her fridge and found some carrots. Clearly she was wasting the money provided by HARD WORKING PEOPLE on cake that she didn’t need. She’d have to learn to budget.

I then explained the situation to her landlord, who, upon finding out that she was claiming cake benefit, asked for six months rent in advance.

She kicked up a fuss, saying that she’d worked hard until her disability made it impossible to work. But I ignored that, because I know that it doesn’t matter any more. We can’t afford to give non-HARD WORKING PEOPLE cake for doing nothing any more, because if we did, we’d have to take money away from the banks and THAT WOULD LEAD TO BANKERS LEAVING THE COUNTRY, WHICH WOULD INITIATE ARMAGEDDON.

Okay, so it's a chocolate roll, but the point remains

Okay, so it’s a chocolate roll, but the point remains

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The hidden impact of draconian welfare on the disabled – an example

I tend to keep deeply personal stuff off the internet where possible, but having just received some news and with an election on the horizon, I think this needs to be made public.

My partner and I have been looking into moving in together. Currently she lives in a one-bedroom flat, and I rent a room in a house-share. We live fifteen minutes apart, separated by a short walk, and a rather big hill.

We’ve been together for nearly four years now, and following a rather rough relapse in August last year, we decided to spend some time looking into how we could make living together work without affecting either of our independence as individuals.

I work part-time for a local charity while I’m building up my new theatre company. I also take whatever acting or modelling work I can get, and take on the odd freelance job. My gross annual income is less than £10k.

My partner is disabled and left her job two years ago as, despite her best efforts, she was no longer able to work. Her health since leaving work has improved considerably, as her has quality of life. However, she still only has a limited amount of energy each day, and at any time she can find herself spending the day in bed if something changes in her condition.

She has personal carers who look after her for a couple of hours a day, helping her with basic tasks. I spend a lot of the week staying over at her flat, in part because she is unable to stay at mine due to the presence of stairs into the house.

Extra stress is placed on both of us, because I effectively live day-to-day out of my backpack. None of my chosen lifestyle is available at my partner’s flat – there simply isn’t room for my guitar, my books, my CDs, my games console etc. So when I want to relax, I have two choices – turn on the laptop and play a computer game (after a full day staring at a screen), or watch TV – something that I rarely do when I’m on my own. As a result, I spend a lot of time at her flat working.

She also feels the pressure because she’s aware that I spend all of my time at her flat, and feels guilty as a result. I’d like to stay at home more often, but it’s not unheard of for me to be making my way up the hill with my backpack at midnight, because she’s not feeling great and needs someone to keep an eye on her.

Today we finally made the phone call to the council, to find out how our finances would be affected if we moved in together. We expected to lose some income between us, but what we were told shocked us, and has meant we have had to stop thinking about moving in together.

If we move in together, my partner will lose all her benefits apart from DLA (which is currently spent entirely on disability support needs – specialist tools, accessories, adaptations of normal household fittings, transport, and crisis needs etc.), because my income of £10k is deemed by this government to be enough for a couple to live on.

In Brighton.

Just think about that for a minute.

To say we are in shock is an understatement. If we were to move in together, we would both lose our independence. And that would be if it was possible in the first place. I’m struggling to live off £10k on my own at the moment, there’s simply no way it would be possible to look after two of us. Even in council housing, c.£450pcm would have to go on rent and council tax (thanks to the new Brighton & Hove City Council changes that mean that disabled people living with partners now have to pay full council tax), before the bills have even been considered.

So we have no choice but to carry on living apart.

For me to make up the shortfall in what we would lose between us, I would need to be earning a minimum of £25k. As someone who has never chased money, and has no dreams of financial wealth, this simply isn’t going to happen. We have no huge outgoings, we don’t smoke, drink, or go out much. I have my fifteen year old car, which allows us to get out and about- if we relied on buses we wouldn’t be able to go to a lot of places, plus it’s more expensive than driving in Brighton.

Of course, I could give up everything I’ve ever worked for, got back into full time work (assuming I can find a job) and be miserable to pay the bills, but that would only add further pressure to our relationship.

We have no choice but to live separately, and there is no hope on the horizon. Even with the potential of a change of government, Labour have said that they will continue with Tory cuts to the welfare system, meaning further pressure will be put on those already most marginalised by society.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Time to put an end to career politicians

Following Liam Byrne’s announcement today that Labour will make further cuts to the welfare budget if they are elected in 2015, I immediately cancelled my Labour Party membership. I don’t think I need to explain my reasons to regular readers, as it ultimately comes down to the fact that I will not support a party that will not support society’s most vulnerable.

Now this could of course be a piece of clever posturing by the Labour Party, and as much I hope it is, that would make it an outright lie. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that Byrne is pandering to public opinion for now, but the mutterings that I heard within the party suggest that this is not the case. But more importantly than that, this now implicates Miliband and Byrne in the scandal of the treatment of Britain’s most vulnerable.

Disabled people and disability activists all over the country have been waiting for the Labour Party to stand up for them. The ConDemNation’s treatment of the disabled is nothing short of disdainful, showing zero respect and making those already in poverty, or on the poverty line, take responsibility for repaying a debt created by a bunch of millionaires with gambling problems. The media campaign that has stigmatised and resulted in a 30% increase in hate crimes against disabled people.

Disability Living Allowance, the benefit available to any disabled person, working or not, is being replaced by PIP. The intention of this is save 25% from the budget, despite official figures only showing a 0.5% fraud rate. This benefit enables disabled people to work. Talk to any disabled person about how their DLA helps their everyday lives and I assure you, you will be shocked at the things that you and I take for granted. Removing this benefit will remove disabled people’s ability to work, it is that simple.

And then of course, if you are unlucky enough to be too unwell to work, you will be put through the Work Capability Assessment. Despite the fact that five doctors who’ve known you for ten years have long identified that you are unable to work, an ATOS doctor will be able to deem you fit for work within twenty minutes. And we haven’t even considered the employment market yet.

So, why am I going over old ground again? Well, it’s quite simple. Until now, the main beacon of hope has been that in the run up to the election, Ed Miliband and the Labour Party would make a stand in the name of humanity. But not only have they not done that, they have taken away potentially what was the last hope for disabled people. They are therefore now as responsible for the anxiety and trauma being suffered by disabled people as the ConDemNation themselves.

Miliband’s weak response to Sonia Poulton’s letters (supported by the signature of 6000 disabled people and campaigners), plus his inability to respond to my letter, gave me a sinking feeling that Labour would let us down on this issue.

I mentioned that this could be political posturing, and this is why we need to end career politicians. While we have a system whereby a politician’s sole purpose in his job is to get his party elected and stay in power, we will always have politicians who will pander to the masses, and therefore alienate vulnerable or minority groups. Do you think David Cameron would have won as many votes if he’d told us that he’s destroying our NHS? No, hence he kept it quiet. Liam Byrne clearly thinks that his statement on welfare cuts will impress the public who are so easily influenced by the right-wing media, whether or not he sees it through is a different matter entirely.

This is why I am keeping a close eye on Democracy 2015 – a campaign based around electing independent individuals who pledge to serve for one term only. This eliminates the need to lie to keep hold of a seat, and allows the elected MP to work for the people, not for the party. Donations to the party are also limited to £50 per person, so no interference from corporations either.

This is still a long way from ideal, but it’s a small step in the right direction, and eliminates the need to have to vote for the least-worst self-serving party every five years.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,